Two years of funded R&D, 100+ interviews, and validated results—not another ChatGPT wrapper.
These aren't our numbers. They're from peer-reviewed research.
of students use AI in studies
HEPI Survey 2025
use generative AI for assessments
HEPI Survey 2025up from 53% in 2024
use ChatGPT for homework
Forbes/multiple 2024-25
have had ChatGPT write entire essays
Intelligent.com 2024
false positive rate in real-world testing
Washington Post
Vanderbilt disabled Turnitin AI detection
Vanderbilt 2023
Higher false positives for ELL & neurodivergent students
Stanford HAI
"The epistemological crisis in higher education caused by AI-generated student work."
— Chris Duke, Vice Provost, San Jacinto College
Phase I results from double-blind evaluation against humans and frontier LLMs.
| Source | Overall Score | Evidence Quality | Citation Accuracy |
|---|---|---|---|
| DebaterHub | 81.7 | 86.7 | 76.2% |
| Human Experts | 70.1 | 56.9 | 8.7% |
| Zero-shot LLMsGPT-4, Claude, Gemini, Grok | 50.6 | 27.1 | 0% |
points better than expert human debaters
points better than frontier LLMs
citation accuracy gap vs ChatGPT
IBM ultimately conceded its debate systems were incapable of engaging in expert human-level debate. — Slonim et al., 2021
A validated rubric for measuring what matters in argumentation.
Built on Dr. Robin Alexander's dialogic teaching research, which showed:
Alexander, 2018; Jay et al., 2017 (RCT)
Quality and relevance of supporting materials
Logical structure and warrant strength
Responsiveness to opposing views
Integration of multiple perspectives into coherent position
"AI, paradoxically, enables us to assess what truly matters for democratic education: dialogical proficiency—the ability to engage in structured, reasoned discourse across difference."
— Hines, 2025
NSF I-Corps customer discovery with educators, administrators, and students.
"ACU signed a deal with OpenAI and administrators are not happy about some of the terms. The most frustrating and urgent need we could fill is the lack of data ownership, citing intellectual property concerns."
— Anne Marie Todd, Professor & Dean, San Jose State University
"Pushback against the OpenAI partnership, with data wall being a primary sticking point. Usage limits were also woefully limiting."
— Shikar Sethi, Entrepreneur, AssessPrep
"Started as an Anti-AI person but is now going to recommend entire First Year Writing program participate in the Pilot... Our focus on dialogical assessment of AI-Proof skills was exciting."
— Jacqueline Foertsch, Professor (First Year Writing)
"AI implementation in classrooms raises concerns about academic integrity and student skill development."
— I-Corps Interview Notes
"Loved the idea of taking rubric-based grading out of hands of instructors so they could focus on leading class discussions and engaging students on developing their ideas and their voice."
— Andrew Leong, Professor of English, UC Berkeley
"Assessment is a key differentiator we need to lean into."
— Michael Street, Lead Editor, Great Minds PBC
"Teachers are leaving the profession because they don't get paid and don't get respect. Administrators are worried about saving money so are also firing teachers. Those who remain are drowning in grading and paperwork and can't focus on developing skills and ideas with students."
— I-Corps Interview (Assessment/EdTech expert)
"Biggest challenge is constant race to close achievement gaps while also having to wear numerous hats at the same time. Biggest improvement from AI is increased time to focus on things that matter."
— Bayleigh Witman, K-12 Educator, Llano ISD
"Ease of integration into existing LMS is extremely important."
— I-Corps Interview (K-12 Tech Director)
"Need for a value proposition document explaining the concept and benefits... Interest in integrating the solution into existing systems like Blackboard or Canvas."
— Chris Duke, Vice Provost, San Jacinto College
"The vast majority of startups at the tradeshow are offering similar and undifferentiated products that all looked to be no more than AI Wrappers. DebaterHub was the only discussion that shared a 'unique vision.'"
— Anjali Tiwary, CEO, Indian Debating League (90,000 students)
"Strong customer market potential as B2C play in India. There's investable value in creating new assessment signals."
— Atul Thakkar, Director, Anand Rathi Investment Banking
Research partnerships validating the approach in real classrooms.
Entire FYW curriculum (thousands/semester)
Champion: Marshall Armintor, Brian Lain
STTR PartnerCommunity college pilot
Champion: Chris Duke
Letter of InterestHonors seminars
Letter of SupportGen Ed Communications
Champion: Anand Rao
Co-PISummer bridge program
Champion: Byron Craig
ExploringFYW/English
Champion: Andrew Leong
InterestedAnjali Tiwary
Investment interest, channel partnerTaiwan/Asia
PartnershipResponsible AI integration in education through debate-based learning.
AAAI-24John Hines
Theoretical foundation for pluralistic AI systems that preserve belief diversity.
Palgrave MacmillanTechnical validation of AI debate system against human experts and LLMs.
National Science FoundationProposal for randomized control trials and university pilots for dialogical assessment.
National Science FoundationWhat makes our AI different from ChatGPT wrappers.
85,000+ evidence cards with validated citations and source material.
Multi-dimensional scoring validated against expert human judges.
50+ coherent perspectives that maintain internal consistency during debates.
Real-time conversation flow without awkward pauses.
Deep Canvas integration with automatic grade passback.